Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Pablo Cedano-Arellano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 2003No. 02-50450PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Defendant-Appellant Juan Pablo Ceda-no-Arellano was indicted on charges of smuggling cocaine into the United States after a search at the Mexican border revealed packages of cocaine in the gas tank of his truck. Cedano-Arellano entered a conditional guilty plea, preserving his right to appeal the following issues: whether the district court erroneously denied him discovery on the narcotics detector dog that “alerted” on his gas tank, whether there was probable cause to support his initial and subsequent arrests, whether there was reasonable suspicion to support the Customs agents’…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Max BudziakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. FortCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Julio Cortez-RochaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.