Legal Opinion

Alford v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1934No. 7 Div. 219PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action at law for money had and received, begun by appellant.

The claim is shown to be for a surplus of the purchase money of real estate sold under the power contained in a mortgage. Section 10145, subd. 5, Code.

The affirmative charge was given for appellee, on the theory that the sale had the effect of cutting off the right to inquire into certain items which entered into the consideration of the mortgage under such circumstances that there was no surplus if those items were included.

The suit is of course predicated upon the existence and foreclosure of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of New Brockton v. DunnavantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Tompkins v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Jones v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. RoyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. &198tna Ins. Co. v. Baldwin Cty. Bldg. Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Davis v. Huntsville Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. First Nat. Bank of Opp v. BolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Mobley v. Brundidge Banking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Harris v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API