Smith v. Medical & Surgical Clinic Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Michael Smith collapsed and suffered a head injury after receiving a flu shot administered under the auspices of his employer, Burlington Northern Railroad Co. Smith brought this statutory negligence action against Burlington Northern under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA” or “the Act”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. The district court granted summary judgment for the railroad, finding that Smith had failed to produce evidence that his injury occurred within the scope of his employment, as FELA requires. We hold that a genuine issue of material fact exists…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mostyn v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Fuerza Unida v. Levi Strauss & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Daniel Wilson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Canadian National/Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Weaver v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Feichko v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Kennedy v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.