Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 15, 2009No. 14-08-00269-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

After being convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, appellant McKinley Dale Thomas filed a pro se motion requesting appointment of appellate counsel, a new trial, and a new trial hearing. The trial court granted the request for appellate counsel but did not conduct a hearing and allowed the motion for new trial to be overruled by operation of law.

In this appeal, appellant claims (1) the trial court improperly allowed the State to amend the indictment after trial began, (2) he was denied counsel in the critical thirty-day period after sentencing, and (3) the trial court…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LE RICHARDSON, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  2. State v. Stewart Le Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. State v. Stewart Le Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API