Legal Opinion

Smola v. City of West St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1951No. 35,371Published

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a third amended complaint.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is an owner in possession of a certain lot in West St. Paul; that defendants claim some right, title, interest, estate, and/or lien in the premises; and that defendants have no right, title, interest, estate, and/or lien in and to said premises. Plaintiff prays judgment that defendants and each of them have no right, title, interest, estate, and/or lien in said prem*158ises. If the above allegations were the only ones in the complaint there would be no difficulty. It would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pleins v. WachenheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. First State Bank v. C. E. Stevens Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Hastay v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Supornick v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Clark v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API