Smola v. City of West St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a third amended complaint.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff is an owner in possession of a certain lot in West St. Paul; that defendants claim some right, title, interest, estate, and/or lien in the premises; and that defendants have no right, title, interest, estate, and/or lien in and to said premises. Plaintiff prays judgment that defendants and each of them have no right, title, interest, estate, and/or lien in said prem*158ises. If the above allegations were the only ones in the complaint there would be no difficulty. It would…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pleins v. WachenheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- First State Bank v. C. E. Stevens Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Hastay v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Supornick v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Clark v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.