Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1998No. 24150PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a magistrate judge’s order requiring appellant, William Wilson (William), to pay spousal maintenance to respondent, Frosty Wilson (Frosty), in the sum of $7,500 per month for six years, and thereafter, $6,500 per month for five years.

I. BACKGROUND

Frosty and William Wilson were married in 1974. During the first fourteen years of the marriage, William attended medical school and received the training necessary to become a plastic surgeon. In 1989, after William completed his medical training, William and Frosty moved to Idaho Falls where William…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Brashear v. BrashearIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pedro Pelayo v. Bertha PelayoIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. McGriff v. McGriffIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stewart v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Thomas v. WorthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Quick Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API