Legal Opinion

Adams v. Nampa & Meridian Irr. Dist.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1953No. 7902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Chief Justice.

Appellant now is and has been since 1905 the owner of the irrigation system known as the Ridenbaugh Canal System. It delivers water for irrigation purposes to lands lying in Ada and Canyon Counties. It is the successor in interest, through *523mesne conveyances, of the Central Canal and Land Company, a corporation, which formerly owned the Ridenbaugh Canal System.

In the year 1889 the Central Canal and Land Company, a corporation, and one Frank De Cloedt entered into an “Indenture and Agreement” whereby the corporation sold and conveyed to De Cloedt for the sum of $640, one…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Yaden v. Gem Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. South Boise Water Co. v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. BriggsIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. HunzikerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Jensen v. Boise-Kuna Irr. Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Jensen v. Boise-Kuna Irr. Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API