Legal Opinion

White v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1933No. 4-2820PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is insisted first that the court erred in refusing to transfer the cause to the chancery court that appellant might have an opportunity to show that the old bank was not really insolvent when it was declared to be so and taken over by the Bank Commissioner for liquidation. He insists that, if certain of the old bank’s property wrongfully transferred to others could be recovered, it was sufficient to pay all its liability without any stock assessment. But, however this may be, this action is not the proper one to try the question of fraud or insolvency.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Davis v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Pike v. WassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Aber v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Poch v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Donaghey v. WassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Wagner ex rel. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API