Legal Opinion

Parker v. Rodriguez

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 28, 2021No. 1:18-cv-24953Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 18-cv-24953-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes DERRICK LAMAR PARKER, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT LIZANDRO RODRIGUEZ and SERGEANT CORY ARMSTRONG, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon pro se Plaintiff Derrick Lamar Parker’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for an Order to Settle Complaint on Agreed Terms. ECF No. [35] (“Motion”). The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, the applicable law, and the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is denied.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. SmythCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API