In re Tiffany
District Court, S.D. New York
Iii Bankruptcy. On motion to confirm commissioners’ report recommending a discharge and application of sundry creditors to delay the same.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
In April, 1903, the bankrupt was insolvent, and has by his own admission continued so to be. He was (and is) in this condition, although in receipt of an income derived from the trust estate of his father, paid to him weekly, and aggregating $18,000 per annum. Being so insolvent he wished to marry his present wife, who insisted, not as a condition of marriage, but as a condition of expediting the union, that he give her outright a supply of household furniture and fittings. No agreement was made as to the quantity or value of such supply. On April 25, 1903, the bankrupt…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- In re DauchyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- In re BrumbaughDistrict Court, D. Pennsylvania · 1904
- In re SkinnerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Schwanz v. Farmers Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Bracewell v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- In re MauzyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1908
- Van Zandt v. ParsonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.