Legal Opinion
In re Brumbaugh
District Court, D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1904No. 297PublishedCited by 14 opinions
In Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
This case is here on two questions: (1) As to the right of the bankrupt to his $300 state exemption; and (2) as to his right to a discharge.
*9721. On January 14, 1903, a judgment was recovered in the court o£ common pleas of Huntingdon county, Pa., against I. Harvey Brum-baugh, the present bankrupt, at the suit of Cora A. Keim, in an action for breach of promise of marriage. This action was begun by capias in trespass, on which the defendant was held to bail, and resulted in a verdict for $9,250 damages, reduced by the court to $5,000, on which judgment was subsequently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Githens v. ShifflerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
- Claster v. SobleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- In re FifeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re James George ONDRAS, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Duffy v. TegelerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- In re VonheeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
- Wharton v. Citizens Bk. of BosworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.