Legal Opinion
Lee Roy Guidry v. Continental Oil Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1965No. 21543_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, arising out of the plaintiff’s claims of resale-price maintenance in violation of the Sherman Act and of a “tying” agreement in violation of the Clayton Act. The plaintiff appeals from an order entered by the district court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the plaintiff’s action.
We view the evidence and the inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the plaintiff to determine whether they are sufficient to show that there is no genuine issue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Aladdin Oil Company v. Texaco, Inc. And Poweram Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- William E. Greene, Food Distributors v. General Foods Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. RubenfeldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- In The Matter Of Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.