Legal Opinion
McElfresh v. Guard
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 19 opinions
APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant, MoElfresh, for the purpose of contesting the validity and probate of the will of Eliza MoElfresh, deceased, filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Dearborn county his allegation in writing, verified by his affidavit, as follows:
“ In the matter of the alleged last will of Eliza McElfresh, deceased. In the Court of Common Pleas, July term, 1866.
“ Comes into open court Enoch MoElfresh and.objects to the probate of the alleged last will and testament of said Eliza MeElfresh, for the following reasons:
“ 1st. Because said deceased was not, at the time of the *410alleged execution of said…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- City of Huntington v. BreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bedford, Springville, Owensburg & Bloomfield Railroad v. RainboltIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- West v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.