Legal Opinion
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. International Game Technology
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 13, 2013No. 2010-1426PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Limited and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “Aristocrat”) and International Game Technology and IGT (collectively, “IGT”) compete in the casino gaming machine industry. In 2006, Aristocrat brought the current action against IGT in the Northern District of California alleging that IGT directly and indirectly infringes two of Aristocrat’s patents — U.S. Patent No. 7,056,215 (“the '215 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,108,603 (“the '603 patent”). The asserted patents generally relate to gaming machines, such as slot…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Mankes v. Vivid Seats Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ivera Medical Corporation v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Medgraph, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.