Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1974No. State 57, 61-65PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Testifying, pursuant to subpoena, before a grand jury investigating price-fixing practices in violation of state antitrust laws, the respondent, George Hall, was asked:

“Q. Would you give a firm denial to any bid rigging from 1960 through 1972? In other words, no, I did not participate in any bid rigging during that time?”

Respondent sought and secured a recess so that he could consult with his attorney. He returned to the grand jury room to state, “I desire to take the fifth amendment.” He was not required nor compelled to answer the question. It was left unanswered.

Thereafter, the respondent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. LloydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Wurtzinger v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BarthelmeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. State v. J. H. S.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API