Legal Opinion

State v. Munro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1991No. 89C-22108; CA A64508PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant pled guilty to burglary. ORS 164.225. He challenges the sentence imposed under the sentencing guidelines. ORS 137.010(1); OAR 253-04-001. We affirm.

The issue in the trial court was the correct computation of defendant’s criminal history. OAR 253-04-006. The parties agreed that defendant had four prior “non-person” felony convictions. Defendant argued that, for purposes of the criminal history, two of those convictions should be “merged.” The trial court determined that the convictions should be counted separately. It then calculated the presumptive sentence according to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. VasbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. WestbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. FernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Gordon v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API