Legal Opinion
Kriz v. Coldwell Banker Real Estate
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 29, 2002No. AC 19745PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*690 Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendants Danforth Smith and Deforest Smith (Smith defendants) appeal from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Mary Kriz, after the trial court granted the motion for a directed verdict filed by the named defendant, Coldwell Banker Real Estate (Coldwell Banker). The Smith defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) directed the verdict in favor of Coldwell Banker on the plaintiffs complaint and on their cross claim for apportionment, (2) admitted into evidence testimony concerning a prior accident, (3) admitted into evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Janusauskas v. FichmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Newalliance Bank v. SchaeppiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Finkle v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015