Legal Opinion

State v. . Hancock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Moore, J., February Term, 1908, of Guilfobd. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark:, C. J.

The defendant, a trusted employee, as manager at Winston of a branch business, whose main office was at Memphis, Tenn., embezzled something over $3,100. He fled with some $2,500 of this and $100 of jewelry which he had bought with his employer’s money, and was arrested in San Francisco with $1,400 of the money on his person, unspent.

The record presents only two assignments of error.

1. “Because the verdict was against the weight of the-evidence.” This is a matter in the discretion of the trial judge. Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N. C., 488; State v. Rose, 129 N. C., 577; Edwards v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. State v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API