State v. . Hancock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Moore, J., February Term, 1908, of Guilfobd. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark:, C. J.
The defendant, a trusted employee, as manager at Winston of a branch business, whose main office was at Memphis, Tenn., embezzled something over $3,100. He fled with some $2,500 of this and $100 of jewelry which he had bought with his employer’s money, and was arrested in San Francisco with $1,400 of the money on his person, unspent.
The record presents only two assignments of error.
1. “Because the verdict was against the weight of the-evidence.” This is a matter in the discretion of the trial judge. Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N. C., 488; State v. Rose, 129 N. C., 577; Edwards v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.