Legal Opinion

Gill v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Iowa District Gourt. These are actions upon a supersedeas bond given in actions appealed to this court. A demurrer to the petition in each case was sustained, and judgment thereon was rendered for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal. The cases, involving the same facts, were submitted upon one abstract.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. In an action in the circuit court, the plaintiffs were held to be the owners of certain real estate, and from the decision the defendants appealed to this court, and filed in the respective actions the supersedeas bonds upon which these suits are brought. The judgments were affirmed in this court. These facts • are alleged in the petition, which claims to recover for the rents and profits of the real estate, and damages for injury done thereto. The bonds are conditioned that “appellants shall pay to the appellees all costs and damages that- shall be adjudged against apjjellants on said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henrie v. BuckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Blyth v. Pinkerton National Detective AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Nourse v. WeitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API