Legal Opinion

Holley v. J & S SWEEPING CO.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1983No. Civ. 50418PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

On appeal from a civil judgment we confront the apparently novel question whether the exercise of peremptory challenges in civil proceedings is subject to scrutiny under the constitutional standard announced in People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 [148 Cal.Rptr. 890, 583 P.2d 748]. We will conclude for the reasons stated that substantially similar constitutional concerns warrant compliance with the Wheeler mandate. Since the record clearly demonstrates noncompliance, we reverse the judgment.

The relevant facts and proceedings below are undisputed: appellant, who is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. People v. MottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Clark v. City of BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
  5. City of Miami v. CornettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API