Legal Opinion

In re the Extradition of Singh

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 29, 1988No. Magistrate Nos. 87-6160G-01, 87-6161G-01PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RONALD J. HEDGES, United States Magistrate.

INTRODUCTION

Separate extradition hearings were conducted as to defendants Sukhminder Singh and Ranjit Singh Gill during the first week of February, 1988. The Court concluded that defendants were extraditable to the Republic of India. See Certifications of Extraditability and Orders of Commitment filed February 5, 1988 (“the Certifications”).

On March 21, 1988 the United States Attorney advised the Court of the existence of substantial evidence that Special Assistant United States Attorney Judy G. Russell, who represented the Government in these…

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BilalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Regan v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. United States v. CooleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  4. Bishop v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Ex Parte BentleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API