Legal Opinion
Hummel v. Brennan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 9, 1979No. Civ. A. No, 79-856PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Lloyd R. Hummel (“Hummel”) and Robert A. Gartner (“Gartner”) brought this action pursuant to Section 102, 29 U.S.C. § 412, of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., against defendants Robert C. Brennan (“Brennan”), Secretary-Treasurer of Local 492; ■ George Szatkowsky, President-Business Manager of Local 492; and Local 492 of the Bakery and Confectionery Workers’ International Union of America, AFL-CIO (“Local”). Plaintiffs challenge the method by which the Local enacted a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Asbestos School LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sanneman v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Fanning v. AcroMed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1985
- Stolz v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local Union No. 971District Court, D. Nevada · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.