Legal Opinion
Hickman v. Taylor
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 30, 1945No. Civil Action No. 3511PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s husband was one of five seamen who were drowned when the Tug “J. M. Taylor,” capsized, on February 6, 1943. On November 26, 1943, she began this suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, to recover damages for his death, and thereafter filed 39 interrogatories, of which No. 38 is as follows:
“State whether any statements of the members of the crews of the Tugs ‘J. M. Taylor’ and ‘Philadelphia’ or of any other vessel were taken in connection with the towing of the car float and the sinking of the Tug ‘John M. Taylor.’ Attach hereto exact copies of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Bondholders Corporation v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Stark v. American Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- United States v. AnayaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- United States v. RuggieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.