Legal Opinion

Henke & Pillot, Inc. v. Hanovice

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1934No. 10217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court — after hearing evidence of both sides — refusing appellant’s application for temporary injunction restraining the appel-lees from using the name “H & P Food Company in connection with their grocery business, and from advertising and soliciting business under that name.”

In so decreeing, the learned trial judge filed these findings of fact and conclusions of law:

“Findings of Fact.
“(1) That the plaintiff, Henke & Pillot, Inc., has been in the grocery business in the City of Houston for a long period of time, beginning as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  2. Dixiepig Corp. v. Pig Stand Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Turner & Seymour Mfg. Co. v. A. & J. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Coca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1929
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. Globe Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. El Chico, Inc. v. El Chico CafeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Plaza Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Goidl v. Advance Neckwear Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. George H. Dentler & Sons v. Fuller's Food ProductsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Ravel v. CouravallosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API