Legal Opinion

Windett v. Union Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1892No. 253PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. In Equity, to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgagor having failed to pay the taxes on the mortgaged premises, they were sold for taxes. The mortgagee bought in the tax titles from the purchaser, and filed this bill to foreclose the mortgage.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. In Equity, to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgagor having failed to pay the taxes on the mortgaged premises, they were sold for taxes. The mortgagee bought in the tax titles from the purchaser, and filed this bill to foreclose the mortgage. The mortgagor set up in reduction of the mortgage debt a claim for retainers as attorney at law of the mortgagee for services never performed, and further contested the allowance of the .amount paid by the mortgagee to acquire the tax titles, on the ground that the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This was a bill in equity by a corporation of Maine against a citizen of Illinois to foreclose a deed of trust, in the nature of a mortgage, of land in Chicago, made by the defendant to the plaintiff on July 12, 1869, 'to secure the payment of his note of that date for $7500, payable in five years, with interest at the rate of eight per cent; and containing covenants that the premises were “ free and clear of all liens and incumbrances,” and that the mortgagor would “ in due season pay all taxes and assessments on said premises, and exhibit once a year receipts of the proper persons to said…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Worcester v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Pacific Coast Joint Stock Land Bank v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Pickens Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. White Black Rivers Bridge Company v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API