Legal Opinion
Maharaj v. California Bank & Trust
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 16, 2013No. 2:11-cv-00315-GEB-EFBPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff and Defendant each move in li-mine for an order precluding the admission of certain evidence at trial. Each motion is addressed below.
A. Plaintiffs Motions in Limine
Motion in Limine No. 1
Plaintiff seeks to “exclud[e] any and all testimony, references to testimony],] or argument based upon the testimony of [Defendant’s human resources expert] Brian H. Kleiner, Ph.D.” (Pl.’s Mot. in Limine (“MIL”) No. 1, 1:21-24.1) Plaintiff argues: “the sole opinion which Dr. Kleiner has been retained to offer at trial[:] ...…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Earl K. Phillips and Carrie Phillips v. The Western Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Beverly P. Davis, Wife Of/and Willie Earl Davis v. Odeco, Inc., Murphy Exploration & Production Company, Originally Sued as Odeco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. Trader Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cleveland v. The BehemothDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Cramton v. Grabbagreen Franchising LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Hamka v. YonanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Hobro v. United Airlines, IncDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
- JB v. Horizon Air Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.