Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. The Behemoth
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 6, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00672Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 13 v. THE BEHEMOTH’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE 14 THE BEHEMOTH, a California OF PLAINTIFF’S DAMAGES corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 Defendants. 16 [Doc. 57] 17 18 On March 4, 2022, Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) filed a Motion in 19 Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff’s Damages (“Motion”). (Doc. 57.) On March 18, 20 2022, Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. v. The Bridgewater Candle Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- CQ, Inc. v. TXU Mining Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.