Legal Opinion

Stutzner v. Printz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1895No. 5717PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Sarpy county. Tried below before Estelle, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Printz brought an action against Stutzner in the county court of Sarpy county to recover on a note which Printz had signed as surety for Stutzner and had paid. Printz on, the same day filed an affidavit for an attachjnent. Stutzner filed a motion to dissolve the attachment, whereupon Printz moved for a continuance and the cause was continued to February 5, but on February 2 a default was entered against Stutzner and judgment rendered upon the petition. On February 5 the motion to discharge the attachment was overruled. Stutzner prosecuted error to the district court,, assigning in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Livingston v. CoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Reed v. MabenNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Walker v. MorseNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coombs Commission Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Working v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Herman Bros. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API