Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. National Investment Corp. v. Leachman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 6, 1981No. 62168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

This appeal, involving construction of the revenue laws, comes to us directly through Art. V, Sec. 3, Missouri Constitution. The question turns on whether Sec. 139.031.1, RSMo 1978, 1 permits a taxpayer to challenge taxes assessed against him by filing written protest after payment of the taxes, when, as here, both payment and protest occur prior to January 1, the date of delinquency. The trial court approving such consecution, compelled the Collector of Revenue (Collector) by its writ of mandamus to impound that portion of taxes disputed by the taxpayer, National Investment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Rhodus v. GeatleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. S. S. Kresge Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Metal Form Corp. v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Xerox Corp. v. TraversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. B & D Inv. Co., Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Buck v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Quaker Oats Co. v. StantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Adcor Realty v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. City of HazelwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API