Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1997No. 96-1075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

At issue in this property-insurance case is whether the insurer effectively cancelled a vacancy permit issued to the insured. The appellants argue that the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment to the appellee. The appellants also argue that the trial court misconstrued Ark. R. Civ. P. 56. We find no error and affirm.

On April 20, 1995, a building owned by the appellants, Mary and Robert Schultz, was damaged by fire. Prior to that date, the appellee, Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Arkansas, Inc., issued a policy of insurance on the property.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. FoehnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Shackelford v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George v. Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Bradshaw Family Trust Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  3. Ingram v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API