Legal Opinion
Ball v. Foehner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 28, 1996No. 95-1251PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT H. Dudley, Justice.
This is a legal malpractice action. Ross and Ramona Ball are the parents of Jeremy, who was born prematurely at Doctors Hospital in Little Rock on December 16, 1989, and was given the drug Theophylline. On December 29, 1989, he began to have unusual symptoms. Now he is partially blind, mentally retarded, and has cerebral palsy. In August of 1990, the Balls retained George Bailey, a Litde Rock attorney, to investigate the advisability of a medical negligence action. In February 1991, Bailey asked Charles Foehner, a St. Louis attorney, to assist him in obtaining expert…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Elliott v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- American Physicians Insurance Co. v. HruskaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Henslee v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Rick's Pro Dive 'N Ski Shop, Inc. v. Jennings-LemonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. Unigard Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- BPS, INC. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. FitzhughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- City of Little Rock v. Ladonna Nelson, as Parent and Next Friend of Ricky Nelson Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly SituatedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.