Legal Opinion
(PC) Coissy v. Doer
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 6, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01556Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAXSONY COISSY, Case No. 1:24-cv-01556-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHOUT 13 v. PREJUDICE (ECF No. 10) 14 DOER, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CREATE A 15 Defendants. CLASS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 11) 16 17 Plaintiff Maxsony Coissy (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. 19 Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971) and the Federal Tort…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927