Legal Opinion

Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Cooney

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 24, 1935No. 1512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

This suit was brought by the above-named plaintiffs against the above-named defendants praying for a decree declaring void that certain statute enacted by the Legislative Assembly of the state of Montana requiring all railroad engines and locomotives to be equipped with a rear headlight (Laws Mont. 1935, c. 75), as one in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution (art. 1, § 8, cl. 3), and also in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment thereof. Application was made by plaintiffs for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Matter of WhishNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Whish v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API