Legal Opinion
IN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 30, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00913Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 IN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION, CASE NO. 21-CV-913-YGR 6 This Document Relates to: All Actions ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER 7 AND GRANTING IN PART THE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT 8 OF INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 70, 71 10 This consolidated action alleges, inter alia, consumer protection claims arising from a 11 congressional report dated February 4, 2021, in which the U.S. House of Representatives 12 Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy found that many popular baby and toddler 13…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Harris Rutsky & Co. Insurance Services, Inc. v. Bell & Clements LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Charles J. Brainerd v. The Governors of the University of Alberta J. Peter Meekison Eugene S. Lechelt Pamela JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.