Legal Opinion

Cronk v. Frazier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1912No. 17,542PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Butler district court.

1Per curiam

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee while he was engaged in blasting rock in appellant’s quarry the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellant. A motion alleging thirteen grounds for a new trial was filed. A new trial was allowed but the ground of its allowance was not stated. From that decision the appeal is taken.

In view of the discretion vested in the trial court in the granting of new trials it is not . easy to obtain a reversal of such an order, especially where a particular reason for its allowance is not known. If the trial court was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Sedan v. ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. White v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Gould v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Schroeder v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Hamill v. HamillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API