Legal Opinion

South Georgia Trust Co. v. Neal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 18, 1931No. 8492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. “As a general rule, the construction of a contract is a question for the court. Where any matter of fact is involved (as the proper reading of an obscurely written word), the jury should find the facts.” Civil Code (1910), § 4265; Fraser v. Jarrett, 153 Ga. 441, 443 (112 S. E. 487).

2. While it is the duty of the court to construe a written contract, still a new trial will not be granted for failure to discharge this duty where the contract is submitted to the jury and properly construed by them. Especially is this true in a case where, if the contract had been properly construed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Main v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Six Flags Over Georgia, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Allstate Insurance v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Allstate Insurance v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Crocker v. TamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API