Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Allstate Insurance v. Brannon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1994No. A94A0792Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcMurray, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent from Division 1 and from the judgment of reversal as it is my view that the plaintiff in this declaratory judgment action, Allstate Insurance Company, (“Allstate”), was not harmed by the erroneous giving of an inapplicable jury instruction on construction of the insurance contract. This erroneous charge did not effectively direct the verdict against Allstate. Consequently, the special interrogatories insulated Allstate against the likely harm occasioned by the trial court’s inapplicable instruction. It follows that such harmless error does not require a new trial. I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. Thrift-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. American Casualty Co. v. Crain-Daly Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance v. FluellenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API