Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 17, 1990No. 90-569CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LYDON, Senior Judge.
In this military pay case, plaintiff, pro se, challenges his separation from the United States Air Force. Plaintiff also contends his reenlistment eligibility rights were violated by the Air Force. The complaint, filed on July 3, 1990, is far from a model of informative pleading. Indeed, the complaint fails to set forth sufficient operative facts on which to gauge the thrust of the legal arguments contained therein. While pro se plaintiffs are not expected to frame issues with the precision of a common law pleading, Rock v. United States Postal Service, 828 F.2d 1555,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ronald J. Roche v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- James W. Clinton v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Philip L. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Monty Shelton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013