Legal Opinion

Hourgette v. City of Gretna

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1931No. 13878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

There is in the city of Gretna certain real estate belonging to Hourgette, plaintiff. The improvements thereon having been damaged by fire, he undertook the repair and reconstruction thereof.

Acting under instructions of the “Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Gret-na,” the police of the said city ordered Hour-gette to discontinue the said work for the alleged reason that no building permit had been obtained, and thereupon he brought this proceeding to enjoin the said police and the said officials from interfering with him in reconstructing his property.

A temporary restraining order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. City of Shreveport v. HerndonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. State v. MahnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  4. State v. DubarrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  5. City of New Orleans v. PalmisanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & SonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Frierson v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. New Prytania Market Ass'n v. BeoubayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API