Legal Opinion
City of New Orleans v. Palmisano
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 2, 1920No. 23830PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Appeal from First Recorder’s Court of New Orleans; J. J. Fogarty, Recorder. Arthur Palmisano was convicted of violating a city ordinance, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.
Defendant was prosecuted for operating a gasoline supply tank in front of bis automobile repair and supply establishment, at No. 4133 St. Charles avenue, in New Orleans, without having obtained a permit from the commission council of the city.
The ordinance which he was accused of violating, No. 2126 of the Commission Council Series, adopted February 2, 1915, and amended by Ordinance No. 5453, approved July 8, 1919, is as follows, viz.:
“Section 1. Be it ordained by the commission council of the city of New Orleans: That hereafter it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cicero Lumber Co. v. Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Galle v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- State v. MahnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
- State v. DubarrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. State of LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Banjavich v. Louisiana Licensing Board for Marine DiversSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- City of Shreveport v. HerndonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. ChisesiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.