Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2001No. 00-71036; Agency No. BRB# 00-542Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Gary Norman Johnson petitions pro se for review from the orders of the Benefits Review Board (“BRB”) affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s summary decision that it lacked jurisdiction over Johnson’s claim, and denying his motion for reconsideration en banc. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 921(c). We review for errors of law and adherence to the substantial evidence standard, Marine Power & Equipment v. Dep’t of Labor, 203 F.3d 664, 667 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition for review.

Johnson was a federal employee, but not an employee of a nonappropriated fund…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Irving LANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Marine Power & Equipment Industrial Indemnity Company v. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board Johnny QuanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API