Legal Opinion
Doe v. Hagee
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 12, 2007No. C 06-1777 MHPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Re: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
PATEL, District Judge.
On March 8, 2006 plaintiffs Jane Doe and Mary Roe filed a complaint for injunc-tive relief and damages against defendants General Michael Hagee, Commandant of the United States Marine Corps; the United States Marine Corps; Donald Winter, Secretary of the Navy; Department of the Navy; Sergeant Brian Fukushima and Staff Sergeant Joseph Dunzweiler alleging that defendants violated plaintiffs’ right to bodily integrity under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs also allege claims sounding in tort…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fisher v. Army National GuardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Mary Lyons v. County of San Bernardino et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Sims v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023