Legal Opinion

Silberman-Doney v. Gargan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 2013No. 091352L3; A149857PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

This residential landlord and tenant case presents a question of civil procedure: Assuming that plaintiff landlord was entitled to seek a new trial under ORCP 64 B after the trial court dismissed the jury during the trial once she and her tenants had entered into a settlement of their dispute, did the trial court have a basis to grant her motion for a new trial because of an “[i]rregularity in the proceedings of the court”? Because, as a matter of law, the trial court lacked a basis to grant plaintiff a new trial for an irregularity or error of law in the proceedings under ORCP 64 B(l) or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RamozCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API