Silberman-Doney v. Gargan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
This residential landlord and tenant case presents a question of civil procedure: Assuming that plaintiff landlord was entitled to seek a new trial under ORCP 64 B after the trial court dismissed the jury during the trial once she and her tenants had entered into a settlement of their dispute, did the trial court have a basis to grant her motion for a new trial because of an “[i]rregularity in the proceedings of the court”? Because, as a matter of law, the trial court lacked a basis to grant plaintiff a new trial for an irregularity or error of law in the proceedings under ORCP 64 B(l) or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RamozCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019