Martin v. Central Vermont R. Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Franklin county. The complaint alleges that defendant is a corporation under the laws of Vermont; that about the 1st day of September, 1887, defendant in this state hired plaintiff to do work in this state; that between September 29 and December 1, 1887, plaintiff did work in this state for defendant under that hiring, for which defendant owes plaintiff $67.90. The answer does not deny the complaint, but avers a partial payment of $32.97, under…
Read the full summary
Appeal from circuit court, Franklin county. The complaint alleges that defendant is a corporation under the laws of Vermont; that about the 1st day of September, 1887, defendant in this state hired plaintiff to do work in this state; that between September 29 and December 1, 1887, plaintiff did work in this state for defendant under that hiring, for which defendant owes plaintiff $67.90. The answer does not deny the complaint, but avers a partial payment of $32.97, under circumstances hereafter to be stated. This action was commenced December 17, 1887. On the trial it appeared that plaintiff…
1Concurrence
Landon, J., (concurring.)
Gray v. Canal Co., 5 Abb. N. C. 131, was in-every respect like the present case, except that the Delaware & Hudson Canal.Company was a Hew York corporation, doing business in Vermont, as well as in this state, and having, as required by the Vermont law, an agent in that state, upon whom legal process could be there served, whereas this defendant is a. Vermont corporation, doing business in this state as well as in Vermont, and having agents here upon whom.legal process can be served. This distinction,, however, is not material. In the case cited, full faith and credit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Towle v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
- Gray v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1878