Legal Opinion
Natalia Kharkhan v. John D. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 2003No. 02-2177PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Natalia Kharkhan seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Court’s denial of her applications for special rule cancellation of removal, asylum, and withholding of removal, and its resulting order of voluntary remov al. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the decision of the BIA.
BACKGROUND
Kharkhan, a native of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and a citizen of the Republic of Ukraine, entered the United States with a valid six-month, non-immigrant, visitor-for-pleasure visa in August…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Teodor Tamas-Mercea v. Janet Reno and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Anguel Iliev and Elena Iliev v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ilyas Ahmad v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Denada M. Bace v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Ujjaval B. Dave v. John D. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Vatulev v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Marina Koval and Valeriy Vagil v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Jose Martinez-Maldonado v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.