Alvarez v. Anesthesiology Associates
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees Anesthesiology Associates and Mary Dale Peterson, M.D. (collectively referred to herein as “Peterson”); Edgar Cortes, M.D. (“Cortes”); Tom McNeil, M.D. (“McNeil”); and William Dirksen, M.D. (“Dirksen”) for claims of malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, and negr ligence resulting from appellees’ medical treatment of Michael Harwood. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
Standard of Review
The standards of review for a summary judgment are…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Garcia v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- AMS Const. Co., Inc. v. Warm Springs Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Garcia v. Willman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Scripps Texas Newspapers v. Belalcazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Entravision Communications Corp. v. Belalcazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.