Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Anesthesiology Associates

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 28, 1998No. 13-96-385-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODRIGUEZ, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees Anesthesiology Associates and Mary Dale Peterson, M.D. (collectively referred to herein as “Peterson”); Edgar Cortes, M.D. (“Cortes”); Tom McNeil, M.D. (“McNeil”); and William Dirksen, M.D. (“Dirksen”) for claims of malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, and negr ligence resulting from appellees’ medical treatment of Michael Harwood. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Standard of Review

The standards of review for a summary judgment are…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. AMS Const. Co., Inc. v. Warm Springs Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Garcia v. Willman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  4. Scripps Texas Newspapers v. Belalcazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Entravision Communications Corp. v. Belalcazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API