Legal Opinion
Entravision Communications Corp. v. Belalcazar
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided February 27, 2003No. 13-02-429-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice RODRIGUEZ.
Appellant, Entravision Communications Corporation (Entravision), a media defendant, brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 51.04 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. pRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(6) (Vernon Supp.2008) (authorizing interlocutory appeal from denial of summary judgment based on claim against or defense by member of media). Dr. Belalcazar sued Entravision for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a television news broadcast on KORO Channel 28. 1 Entravision filed traditional and no-evidence…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cram Roofing Co., Inc. v. Parker, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Magnusson v. New York Times Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Bobby Wayne Bullock v. Ken Jerome McLean, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Bobby Wayne Bullock v. Ken Jerome McLean, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Columbus Eric Johnson Sr. v. Orange River Royalties, L.L.P., Patrick Beathard, and Nicholas S. Bressi, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.