Elam v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
The appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of sale of cocaine. Punishment was assessed by the court at twelve years’ imprisonment.
Fourteen grounds of error are raised in this appeal. The first urges that the State was allowed to bolster the credibility of its witness Ronald Ray Tucker.
Tucker, an undercover agent for the Department of Public Safety, had purchased six “papers” of cocaine from the appellant on March 3, 1973. The appellant, raising the defense of entrapment, urged that Tucker was the motivating force behind the sale.
At trial, Tucker was called as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Prudhomme v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.