Legal Opinion

Zachary v. Gregory

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Fayette. Tried below before the Hon. George W. Smith. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

On a proceeding in partition between the heirs of John Mm’chison, deceased, certain lands which had belonged to deceased and descended to his children were sold. The plaintiff in error became the purchaser. The defendant in error, Gregory, had been appointed guardian of the property *456of the heirs of John Hurchison, deceased, and Zachary executed to him a promissory note, to secure the purchase money, in the sum of $5360 30, payable on the first day of January, 1860. The note was not paid at maturity, and Gregory brought suit upon it in his fiduciary capacity, asking the court to enforce the…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kerr v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Day v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Williams v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Cockrum v. Cal-Zona CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Aldridge v. PardeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API