Legal Opinion
Seaboard Surety Co. v. North Dakota
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided November 9, 1950No. Civ. No. 1738PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, District Judge.
This is an action for the recovery of money. The Seabord Surety Company, a corporation, hereafter referred to as the “surety”, is plaintiff. The State of North Dakota and the Highway Department of the State of North Dakota, together referred to here as “The State of North Dakota”, and Dakota National Bank of Bismarck, North Dakota, hereafter called the “bank”, are defendants. Diversity of citizenship and more than the statutory amount are involved. All jurisdictional requirements of a United States District Court have been satisfied.
On September 12, 1947, the Rolfson…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Brown v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- National Surety Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1961
- National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955